The Gaussian beam spreadsheet provides an easy way to interactively design systems that work with Gaussian beams. We will consider the design of a cavity for a hypothetical Nd:YAG laser. The task is to design a cavity to support single transverse mode oscillation in a YAG rod. The YAG rod is 0.5mm diameter and 5mm long. The cavity consists of two plane mirrors, and a focusing lens, Melles Griot part number 01LQF005. The cavity is to work in a near hemispherical geometry, as shown in the figure below. The exact length of the cavity is to be adjusted so that the spot size of the TEM 00 mode is 1/3 the diameter of the laser rod.
The next task is to determine the TEM 00 mode of the cavity. To do this, use Calculate >> Gaussian Beam >> Interactive ABCD Analysis. The method is to set the radius of curvature of the wavefront on the object surface to the radius of curvature of the mirror, then adjust the spot size on the object surface (the variable cell) until the radius of curvature of the wavefront on the image surface (the watch cell) is equal to the radius of curvature of the other mirror. In any stable curved mirror cavity, any wavefront can be replaced by a mirror of the same radius of curvature withoutchanging the transverse mode structure, since the wavefronts of a Gaussian beam are always spherical. If you are used to the conventions used in the laser literature, you should be especially careful about the sign conventions used in OSLO. Particularly note that OSLO takes the radius of curvature of a spherical wavefront to be positive when the center of curvature is to the right.
The following table shows a succession of values entered.
Variable Cell | Watch Cell |
.1 | 11.012173 |
.01 | -902.043228 |
.02 | 1.2916e04 |
.015 | -1.2744e03 |
.0175 | -2.2587e03 |
.019 | -6.4480e03 |
.0195 | -2.3166e04 |
.0197 | 2.4960e05 |
At this point, the value is close enough to state that we have found the TEM00 mode. Next, click the Print beam data in text window button. Instead of varying the spot size, you could vary the lens data. For example, try varying the object thickness by typing th 0 5.1 in the command line. You will see that the Gaussian beam spreadsheet is updated automatically to use the new data.
The spot size on the end of the rod is 0.1346mm, whereas the design target is 0.5/3 = 0.16667mm. The way to increase it is to move the mirrors a little farther apart (i.e. move towards the edge of the stable region). Changing the object distance to 5.1mm changes the spot size on the rod to about .205, and the spot size on the object surface to .013mm. If we set the object distance to 5.07 we find the spot size on the object surface to be .016, and the spot size on the end of the rod to be .1662, close enough for now. The final touch up could be to move the image surface mirror by the waist distance. Having determined the correct cavity spacing, we can plot the beam profile using the Plot beam spot size button in the spreadsheet. This produces an anamorphic picture of the beam, in which the z scale is the overall length of the system, and the y scale is the maximum spot size. In effect, it is a plot of true paraxial rays. On this scale, the surfaces all appear to be straight lines.
Printing the beam data to the text window produces the following data for the final system:
*GAUSSIAN BEAM – YZ PLANE WAVELENGTH = 1.064000 M-SQUARED = 1.000000
SRF SPOT SIZE DIVERGENCE WAIST SIZE WAIST DIST INC RADIUS RFR RADIUS 0 0.016000 0.021164 0.016000 1.0000e-06 5.7134e+05 5.7134e+05 1 0.016000 0.021164 0.016000 — — — 2 0.108506 0.011630 0.016000 -9.227400 -5.182691 -9.432497
3 0.166244 0.021164 0.016000 -7.817253 -14.360419 -7.890340 4 0.176782 0.014601 0.016000 -12.056947 -8.385946 -12.156528 5 0.216075 0.001567 0.216073 0.559750 -14.838308 3.3950e+04